However, the Board went on to rule, citing Zamora, “that to compel an inference of causally related lost earnings from …an involuntary separation would illogically constrain the ability of the Board to find facts, and would shift the <a href="https://thelomad.com/getmad.today/wp-contentwww.getmad.today/blog/2014/11/in-kigin-v-wcb-the-court-of-appeals-upholds-the-presumption-that-treatment-outside-the-mtgs-is-not-medically-necessary-and-the-attending-physician-has-the-burden-of-proof-of-the-need-for-a-variance/">burden of proof</a> from claimant to employer