However, in <em>Matter of Longley Jones</em>, the Full Board found that a distinction should not be drawn between a working and non-working claimants. It found that considering a working claimant‘s temporary sometimes partial job earnings, could ultimately lead to an unjust result between working and non-working claimants with exactly the same impairment. Thus, the Full Board did not favor a distinction between working and non-working claimants, but did emphasize that a claimant’s wages at the time of classification remains an important factor that should be considered with all the other factors in determining a claimant’s loss of wage earning capacity. <em>Matter of Longley Jones Management Corp,</em> 2012 NY Wrk. Comp. 60704882.