The WCLJ, and Board, bit at this quite obvious charade, and in both decisions rendered by the Board demonstrated that they didn’t even bother to <a href="https://thelomad.com/getmad.today/wp-contentduplicate-3602675.findlaw5.flsitebuilder.com/blog/2013/01/did-you-know-facebook-pages-are-not-considered-surveillance-that-has-to-be-disclosed-before-a-claimant-testifies/">consider the Town’s argument that the claimant</a>, having reported the case as an accident on his C-3, described an accident to his physician, and testified under oath to a specific happening – and accident